װיקיפּעדיע:קאנדידאטורן/יוני ארכיוו 2007

requests for additional user rights

• (please insert your request below)

Bot status for PipepBot

Hello! I ask for permission to run my interwiki bot PipepBot here, and to get a bot flag for it.

• Operator: it:User:Pipep
• Purpose: Interwiki
• Software: Pywikipedia
• Have bot flag at: als, am, an, ar, az, bat-smg, be-x-old, bn, bs, ca, ceb, cs, cv, da, en, eo, et, fo, fur, fy, ga, hr, id, is, ka, ksh, la, li, lv, mk, nap, nds, nds-nl, nn, no, pms, roa-tara, simple, sl, sr, sv, th, uk, vec
• Details: Interwiki using Pywikipediabot. It mostly runs manually assisted. May run automatically in some cases.

Thank you! --it:User:Pipep 19:27, 10 אױגוסט 2007 (UTC)

PipepBot has now bot status. Thank you. it:User:Pipep 17:04, 30 אױגוסט 2007 (UTC)

BotMultichill

Hi, i request a bot bit for BotMultichill.

• Botmaster : Multichill
• Bot's name : BotMultichill
• List of botflags on others wikipedias: 30 atm (see meta:User:Multichill for the current list)
• Purpose: Interwiki (pywikipedia)
• Technical details : BotMultichill is an interwiki bot starting at the Dutch wikipedia. The bot uses the pywikipedia framework and runs day and night in autonomous mode. Sometimes the bot will run in manual assisted mode to solve interwiki conflicts. Multichill 14:04, 5 יוני 2007 (UTC)

let us try u out first please dont expect bot status before we know u

your work here is going to be cherished and much wanted but we need transperecy

if u r working behind the scenbec of the normel user youyr bot must have some status

thanks for caring about us--Yiddish wikipedia 14:35, 5 יוני 2007 (UTC)

Please disregard the last comment it was written by our biggest and "only" vandal. --יואל.מ 17:15, 28 יוני 2007 (UTC)

---

Byrialbot

Hello, I ask for permission to use my interwiki bot Byrialbot here, and possibly get a botflag for it if your prefer.

• Owner: User:byrial (Home project: da:User:Byrial)
• Purpose: Interwiki
• Runs with botflag at: ar:, da:, en:, eo:, fo:, he:, is:, it:, nds:, nn:, no:, sv:, uk: and it is requested other places.
• Details: The bot wil do interwiki linking starting from da:, nn:, no:, and sv: using the Pywikipediabot framework. It will mostly run manually assisted and I will try to solve found interwiki conflicts.

The bot is not running yet as it waits for your permission. Please tell if you like to see some test edits. Thank you! Byrial 22:26, 10 יוני 2007 (UTC)

I see no objections, so I will start the the bot so you can see it in action. Byrial 10:43, 20 יוני 2007 (UTC)

Bot bit SieBot

I would like to request bot status for my bot.

• Botmaster : Siebrand
• Bot's name : SieBot
• List of botflags on others wikipedias: 70 approved, 10 pending
• Purpose: Interwiki (pywikipedia)
• Technical details : SieBot is an interwiki bot starting at the Dutch wikipedia. The bot uses the pywikipedia framework and runs day and night in autonomous mode. Sometimes the bot will run in manual assisted mode to solve interwiki conflicts. Siebrand 23:05, 18 יוני 2007 (UTC)

let us try u out first please dont expect bot status before we know u

your work here is going to be cherished and much wanted but we need transperecy

if u r working behind the scenbec of the normel user youyr bot must have some status

--Yiddish wikipedia 14:28, 21 יוני 2007 (UTC)thanks for caring about us

Please disregard the last comment it was written by our biggest and "only" vandal. --יואל.מ 17:15, 28 יוני 2007 (UTC)

candidacy of רוני for sysop

In the recent past there have been several votes, which were very unclear, especially the result. There has been a vote on meta too, which cannot be counted, as meta is not part of this project.

But the question remains: Does this community want user:רוני to be sysop? In my perspective, the community is the boss at the end, but to know what the community wants, there has to be a fair vote, and the rules must be clear. I will hence propose in the near future to you a set of proposals regarding voting etc.

But for now, we have to come up with a few rules of our own. These are the rules for this specific vote:

• The vote is on the election of user:רוני as a sysop.
• He will be elected as sysop when 75% of the community supports him.
• The vote will start on june 17 2007 12.00h UTC and last for 14 days.
• Persons with more then 100 edits and more then 1 month since their first edit (counting on 14 june 2007, 20:00h UTC) are allowed to vote. (The person voted upon may of course not vote)
• You may only vote once. Attempting to vote with sockpuppets is explicitely forbidden, and these votes will be cancelled, all of them (also the original, "valid", vote). The user using sockpuppets for this will get blocked for a long time (all accounts). A checkuser will be performed on *every* voter.
• The official language of this vote will be English, however it is appreciated if everything will be translated.
• Comments at the votes are not allowed. If you want to explain your vote, you can do so at the comments-section.
• Effeietsanders will be the vote coordinator. It is not allowed to strike votes. Only Effeietsanders is allowed to do that. Requests for striking votes can be made in the comments section.

Translated in Yiddish

קאנדעדאטור פון רוני לעצטנס זענען פארגעקומען וואלען דא און אויף אנדערע פלעצער, די וואלען זענען געווען נישט קלארע, מיר קענען די אלע וואלען נישט רעכענען. די שאלה איז: וויל דער ציבור האבן רוני אלס מנהל, צו וויסן א תשובה אויף די שאלה דארף פארקומען יושר'דיגע וואלען. הלכות פון די וואלן

• די וואלען איז פאר רוני אלס מנהל.
• ער וועט ווערן מנהל אויב באקומט ער 75% פון די שטימען.
• די וואלען וועלן זיך אונהייבן ר"ח תמוז, 12:00 פארטאגס און וועלן אונגיין פאר 14 טעג.
• באנוצער וואס זענען געווארן חברים לכה"פ 30 טעג פאר די וואלען און זיין האבן מער וואו 100 ביישטייערונגען, וועלן זיין בארעכטיגט צו שטימען.
• איר מעגט נאר שטימען 1 מאל אויב וועט איר פארבירן צו שטימען מער וואו 1 מאל אפילו מיט אנדערע נעמען וועט אייער שטימע נישט ווערן גערעכענט (אפילו די אויסגעהלטענע שטימע וועט ווערן אויסגעמעקט).

די שטימעס וועלן אריבערגיין א "טשעק יוזער" צו אידענטעפיצירן די וועלעכע שטימען מער וואו איין מאל.

• די וואלן דארף פארקומען אויפן ענגלישן שפראך, אויב קענט איר ביטע שרייבט ענגליש און יודיש.
• איר טארט נישט צולייגן קיין שום הגהה צום שטימע, (די שטימע דארף זיין נאר אייער חתימה), אויב ווילט איר שמועסן איבער די וואלן קענט איר דאס טון נאר אין דעם "שמועס" אפטיילונג.
• איר טארט נישט רירן קיין שום שטימע, צולייגן, מעקן אדער ארפנעמען וכדו'.
• Effeietsanders וועט קראדינירן די וואלן, נאר ער מעג מעקן צולייגן וכדו'.

---

---

In favor - מסכים

1. --שמאלץ רעדן / בליץבריוו 23:55, 17 יוני 2007 (UTC)
2. --אלץ-ווייסער 02:11, 18 יוני 2007 (UTC)
3. ----יודישער שרייבער 17:42, 18 יוני 2007 (UTC)
4. -- --י. לעבאוויטש 14:06, 19 יוני 2007 (UTC)
5. --יעקלראציגער 13:23, 20 יוני 2007 (UTC)
6. --פוילישער 16:43, 24 יוני 2007 (UTC)
7. --יואל.מ 16:54, 28 יוני 2007 (UTC)
8. --קאצקער 19:50, 28 יוני 2007 (UTC)

The voting has been closed

---

Against - דערקעגן

1. --יודל 14:21, 17 יוני 2007 (UTC)
2. --Amsgila123 23:40, 19 יוני 2007 (UTC)

the voting has been closed

---

---

Striked votes

• In favor: # --DMY 15:22, 18 יוני 2007 (UTC) -- First edit: 25 mei 2007 02:55, which is after may 14, sorry. Effeietsanders 10:41, 20 יוני 2007 (UTC)
• Against: #--איין ראנד 15:30, 20 יוני 2007 (UTC) First edit: 7 jun 2007 13:42, which is after may 14, sorry. Effeietsanders 07:29, 21 יוני 2007 (UTC)
• Against: # --Yiddish wikipedia 14:25, 21 יוני 2007 (UTC) First edit: 5 jun 2007 14:03 , which is after may 14, sorry. Effeietsanders 07:57, 22 יוני 2007 (UTC)
• In favor: #--חאצקעל 21:48, 24 יוני 2007 (UTC) Less then 100 edits, sorry. Effeietsanders 11:40, 26 יוני 2007 (UTC)
• Against: #--Mechel2 13:53, 26 יוני 2007 (UTC) Less then 100 edits on june 14 and first edit on 4 jun 2007 17:38, sorry. Effeietsanders 18:17, 26 יוני 2007 (UTC)
• Against: #--יחות 15:00, 26 יוני 2007 (UTC) Less then 100 edits on june 14, sorry. Effeietsanders 18:19, 26 יוני 2007 (UTC)
• Against:#--Yoivy 17:50, 26 יוני 2007 (UTC) Less then 100 edits on june 14 and also <1 month active on june 14, sorry. Effeietsanders 18:20, 26 יוני 2007 (UTC)
• Against:#--ברוך 19:35, 26 יוני 2007 (UTC) Less then 100 edits and first edit after may 14, sorry. Effeietsanders 10:39, 27 יוני 2007 (UTC)
• Against:#--אנדערע יוּדל 21:48, 26 יוני 2007 (UTC) Less then 100 edits and first edit after may 14, sorry. Effeietsanders 10:41, 27 יוני 2007 (UTC)
• Against:#--שומר פיו 14:53, 27 יוני 2007 (UTC) First edit: 6 jun 2007 14:56, after may 14. Sorry. Effeietsanders 13:01, 28 יוני 2007 (UTC)
• Against:#--דעת 16:09, 27 יוני 2007 (UTC) First edit: 15 jun 2007 16:16; after may 14. Sorry. Effeietsanders 13:02, 28 יוני 2007 (UTC)
• Against: #--Joel Ahron 20:22, 27 יוני 2007 (UTC) First edit: 13 jun 2007 16:58 ; after may 14, sorry. Effeietsanders 13:04, 28 יוני 2007 (UTC)
• Against: #--השמח בחלקו (-: 20:15, 28 יוני 2007 (UTC) First edit: 28 jun 2007 19:27 and less then 100 edits. Sorry, Effeietsanders 09:35, 30 יוני 2007 (UTC)

Results

There are at the moment 8 votes in favor, and 2 against. However, to confirm the result, a checkuser has to be awaited. Thanks for your patience. Effeietsanders 17:40, 2 יולי 2007 (UTC)

I beleive it would only be fare to do a checkuser against the votes that were sticken out too as well as the still valid ones, and if there were any suckpuppets in the still valid list, it should be stricken out. Just an advise, Thanks. --נאך עפעס א יודל 17:56, 2 יולי 2007 (UTC)

The rules say: "You may only vote once. Attempting to vote with sockpuppets is explicitely forbidden, and these votes will be cancelled, all of them (also the original, "valid", vote). The user using sockpuppets for this will get blocked for a long time (all accounts). A checkuser will be performed on *every* voter." So even the attempt to vote twice is illegal. I think it is obvious to ask the checkuser to also take those votes into consideration. Effeietsanders 20:46, 2 יולי 2007 (UTC)

Thank You. --נאך עפעס א יודל 21:47, 2 יולי 2007 (UTC)

Result

There are 8 valid votes in favor, and 2 against. That means that there is 80% support, and that is sufficient. He can be promoted to sysop. Good luck. Effeietsanders 17:05, 12 יולי 2007 (UTC)

Thank You ►רוני◄ 17:23, 12 יולי 2007 (UTC)

Discussion on striked votes

I'm very sorry for our devoted sysop Effeietsanders who is kept so busy with all the abuse going on here. It's a shame. I hope and pray that Effeietsanders will not let us down in this time of crisis - EIFF: Just keep up your good work! --אלץ-ווייסער 16:54, 28 יוני 2007 (UTC) look who is sorry for thisd abuser a proven sockpupet who voted twice on this page. TELL ME WHO YOUR FREINDS ARE; AND I WILL TEL YOU WHO YOU ARE!!--ווייס 17:20, 28 יוני 2007 (UTC)

Please strike out illegal votes

1. באַניצער:DMY is not here a month since his first edit he is not allowed to vote here please be fare and lets hold your word, erase his illegitimate vote. thanks--יודל 10:04, 20 יוני 2007 (UTC)
2. באַניצער:איין ראנד is not here a month since his first edit he is not allowed to vote here and he does not have a single edit in the normal namespace. please erase his illegitimate vote. thanks --69.18.197.169 15:54, 20
3. באַניצער:Amsgila123 and באַניצער:יודל are the same person and he does not have a single edit in the normal namespace. please strick both. --69.18.197.169 16:10, 20 יוני 2007 (UTC)
4. באנוצער:יודלneeds to be deleted he voted 3 tims under 3 diffarent names. all 3 disagre.
5. Please striker out באַניצער:יעקלראציגער he does not have a single edit in the normal namespace--Yoivy 17:17, 20 יוני 2007 (UTC)
6. Based on the above please strikout User:Amsgila123 based on the fact that he has less than 100 edits under normal namespace. Thank you.--שמאלץ רעדן / בליץבריוו 17:44, 24 יוני 2007 (UTC)

check my history and than talk.--יעקלראציגער 17:24, 20 יוני 2007 (UTC)

1. Yiddish wikipedia is here les then a month please strick it. (he is Yidel as well(

I Stroke two invalid votes with <1 month active. I will not strike sockpuppets for now, that will be checked and taken care of at the end of the vote. Effeietsanders 07:32, 21 יוני 2007 (UTC)
It was already checked at the time by a respected steward through checkuser tool whop found him to be an illegal user who voted here as a sock puppet [1]. in no other wiki is a sockpuppet allowed to vote please be fare and don't force us your opinion this isn't normal a stewart should force against all wikipedia rules he is a sock puppet and there is no need to recheck it a third time since he is probably smarter now to use a totally different computer terminal. Remember this is insane to except a vote from a open declared sockpuopet stop this nonsense please!--יודל 15:10, 24 יוני 2007 (UTC)

If so please remove Yidles vote as he has been a proven sockpuppet according to the definition of sockpuppet here. If I would be as arogant as Yidel is I would have done just that, but I trust that effeietsander will re-insert that vote.--שמאלץ רעדן / בליץבריוו 16:57, 24 יוני 2007 (UTC)

You can trust him i don't. he can block me from wikipedia i will not let him abuse our community. And yes still waiting for your link where i was a sockpupet. Eff has begged that other stewards should block me but he has failed to give them proof so please help out your friend hijacker here with a link so i can be blocked.--יודל 17:03, 24 יוני 2007 (UTC)

A link that what? that you use more than one username?--שמאלץ רעדן / בליץבריוו 17:07, 24 יוני 2007 (UTC)

I reverted the removal of the vote. It is clearly stated that at the *end* of the vote there will be a check for sockpuppets, and of course that will also include checking for earlier results. I am disappointed that Yidel here assumes bad faith of mine, I have not requested a block specifically for you at all. I only requested a checkuser as far as I know. Please do not change my comments either, although it is only a spelling mistake, that is not done without permission when there is no personal attack or a similar text. I kindly ask you for patience before I will ask someone to digg into the voting for checkuser. You can provide in the mean while proof with links that proof the sockpuppetry here, and there will be looked on it at the end of the voting. Thanks for the patience. Effeietsanders 17:12, 24 יוני 2007 (UTC)

who assumes bad faith i or u? and who is disappointed? this [2] is written by one guy and its not me its a so called steward who is asking his friends to act on suspicions users that they are yudel! wow and you are disappointed!!! and when your friends ignore you seeing clearly how biased you are and they archive it. You go and replace it. and this is a steward?!--יודל 17:23, 24 יוני 2007 (UTC)--יודל 17:23, 24 יוני 2007 (UTC)

1. This user באַניצער:חאצקעל does not have 100 edits here so his vote should not be counted if we had a just and uncorrupted steward--יודל 11:49, 25 יוני 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for noticing and your kind request. Effeietsanders 11:41, 26 יוני 2007 (UTC)

1. באַניצער:ברוך does not have 100 edits here, and he is here less then a month and he is a sock popet of Yidel. so his vote should not be counted
2. באַניצער:Yoivy signed up after the vote started please delete his vote
3. באַניצער:אנדערע יוּדל if here les then a month, please delete his vote.

--75.193.27.156 00:48, 27 יוני 2007 (UTC)

1. --שומר פיו is here les then a month, vote needs to be deleted.
2. --דעת is here les then a month, vote needs to be deleted. and both are sock's of Yidel.

--69.18.197.169 17:04, 27 יוני 2007 (UTC)

1. באַניצער:השמח בחלקו (-: just signd up today please delete his vote.

--66.174.79.230 03:59, 29 יוני 2007 (UTC)

Lets applaud Eiff for his heroic work !

I'm very sorry for our devoted sysop Effeietsanders who is kept so busy with all the abuse going on here. It's a shame. I hope and pray that Effeietsanders will not let us down in this time of crisis - EIFF: Just keep up your good work! --אלץ-ווייסער 16:54, 28 יוני 2007 (UTC)

YOU HAVE NO SHAME?! A STAEWRD HAS FOUND YOU VOTING TWICE ON THIS PAGE AND INSTEAD YOU SHOULD HIDE IN SHAME YOU CALL YOUR HEROES HEWRE TO RECK HAVOCK?!--אידיש 16:59, 28 יוני 2007 (UTC)

Eiff: just keep up the good work. We all appreciate your hard work !--אלץ-ווייסער 17:08, 28 יוני 2007 (UTC)

Eff should you be Blessed 10-Q = Thank you, (in British accent) please keep up dont let your self down from Yidels Nerve busting way of communication to others. --יואל.מ 17:21, 28 יוני 2007 (UTC)

ANOTHER HEROTIC HERE U VOTED NOW TO SILENCE AND SENCER EVERYTHINK JUST WHEN WAS YOUR LAST EDIT?! u dont have to answert we know it all good compeny here a sockpupet and a corupt stewrd --ווייס 17:24, 28 יוני 2007 (UTC)

שמועסן וועגן די וואלן

• לכתחילה איז בעסער שמועסן אויף די ענגלישע שפראך (אויב איז דאס וויכטיק).

Please, do me a favor, and do not vote twice this time... Be kind and gentle. Effeietsanders 20:24, 14 יוני 2007 (UTC)

מיינע פלאנען איבער א וואנדאל:

• נישט אים לאזן אטאקירן באניצער.
• נישט אים לאזן זיך פאַרשטעלן מיט פארשיידענע נעמען.
• נישט אים לאזן אריבערפירן קעפלעך קעגן דעם דעת הרבים.
• נישט אים לאזן שרייבן וועגן פריוואטע פערזענלעכקייטן.
• נישט אים לאזן שרייבן אינפארמאציע אָן געהעריקע מקורות.
• נישט אים לאזן שרייבן אפנייגלע (סוֹטים) טעמען.
• און אזוי ווייטער...

►רוני◄ 21:57, 14 יוני 2007 (UTC)

Translation: my plans here over a Vandal:

• i will not let him attack others.
• i will not let him hide with several names.
• i will not let him write about private people.
• i will not let him write information without sources.
• i will not let him write information that is about straying subjects.

This translate made by user:יודל and its absolutely wrong. ►רוני◄ 22:29, 14 יוני 2007 (UTC)

The votes didn’t even started, but the baby fights with "Yidel" already started, I am asking everyone not to answer “Yidel”, by now it doesn’t matter what he says, we will have a chance to vote, and I hope “Runi” will win strongly. --טעכניקער 01:26, 15 יוני 2007 (UTC)

איך קען שוין קוים ווארטן צו שטימען פאר רוני, אפילו יודל/זלמן לייב לייגן פרעשאר און האט שוין געלייגט מעלדונגען פאר אלע בנוצער אויף זייערע שמועס זיייטן נישט צו שטימען פאר רוני, פאר סיבות פון שקרים וכזבים, כאילו רוני איז דער וואנדעל און נישט ער, סתם ווייל יענער איז און נישט ער. --יואל.מ 22:01, 14 יוני 2007 (UTC)

sorry but wikipedia is not a democracy the foundation is governed by laws to protect the freedom of information, if the candidate says that he will block other users who will write about sex and other issues that he views as straying we cannot let him be sysop.--יודל 22

23, 14 יוני 2007 (UTC)

so vote against him no need to keep repeating the same thing again and again, vote against him, I will vote for him. --יואל.מ 23:49, 14 יוני 2007 (UTC)

No way your vote will be disregarded by the foundation anyways go ahead and waste your time and energy you will not silence nobody forget about it!--יודל 23:53, 14 יוני 2007 (UTC)

::: Go on with your endless foolish and lying arguments, I will attend from time to time but not always, again you have the option to vote against him. We had enough of your end less arguations enough of your personal attacks enough of your explanations on the smell …….. creates and that usually its brown, as well as that kids are sweet and have big eye’s and are naïve, sorry you cannot say on some one deleting that "that he is against sex” etc --יואל.מ 00:07, 15 יוני 2007 (UTC)

This is runis deceleration today: i will not let him write information that is about straying subjects and those words strike him out of being a sysop even if he haves a billion votes against 0 because he cannot censure this if its true, it may be straying in his eyes, but it is still censorship. Is it true or not? if its true it cannot be deleted period and end of game he cannot break the rulls of the foundation we are protected by the laws--יודל 00:11, 15 יוני 2007 (UTC)

Its “not” runis words, its “your” translation, I just wonder why you did not translate it as “I will kill you” --יואל.מ 00:21, 15 יוני 2007 (UTC)

go ahead and translate it your way lets see why are you silent you have translated the whole page only not this why? what is your version?--יודל 00:23, 15 יוני 2007 (UTC)

i translate it as "stinking stuff" , you know what he refers to.--יואל.מ 00:31, 15 יוני 2007 (UTC)

So here you go: if he deletes openly truth because it stinks he is a vandal that must be blocked not promoted to block others. where is your brain? this is an open free encyclopedia get used to it my brother--יודל 00:36, 15 יוני 2007 (UTC)

hi avery sorry one my English is not very good, but I will ask any way,

it was her a vote and runny won, he has the most vote’s, is he all reedy a sysop or not, the only one agnes him was yidel and even it will be no votes, he will not listen, he sed runny can not be sysop even if he haves a billion votes against 0 so in the Apennine of yidel he can not be a sysop, and all other’s know all reedy runny have the votes, so whet is the problem wit the old votes, so we can prevent this shad never happen.

let say runny will win again, but yiedel will still making crazy all the people, so wot is the perpise to make votes again, thanks --יודישער שרייבער 00:46, 15 יוני 2007 (UTC)

Hi Yiddish Shriber,

רוני האט געווינען די וואוט אבער יודל. זלמן לייב. האט ווי געוועליך פארפירט און געמעקט צוגעלייגט וכדו' ממילא קען מען נישט וויסן פונקליך וואס עס איז פארגעגאנגען, אבער יעצט איז דא פרישע וואלען, און עס ווערט באוואכט דורך איינעם פון די ענגלישע וויקיפידע, זונטאג קענסטו נאכאמאל וואוטען פאר רוני און אי"ה יעצט וועט דאס אריבערגיין. --יואל.מ 00:45, 15 יוני 2007 (UTC)

the same thing he is making crazy he will making crazy all other, the votes is not word noting, only if the viki people will rite her if runny win the votes the second time he will be a sysop,

if not yidel will not accept this.

thanks

--יודישער שרייבער 00:54, 15 יוני 2007 (UTC)

Hello all,

Let me clarify a few things: Yes, there were votes before on this candidacy. I know of two of them. The first was here on this page, it is archived, I beleive there is a link on the top of this page, the second was on metawiki. The first had the major problem that it was unclear what happened due to all the strikes etc. The second was on meta, and could not be considered as a real community vote. Hence I started a third vote. The first two votes have not been given a result. He is not sysop at the moment.

Further I heard some complaints about the 75%. Yidel asked to put it on 80%, Joel.m asked for 50%. I have seen votes on quite some different Wiki's, and a 3/4 majority is quite regular as you need to represent more as just the majority of the community. The idea is that a sysop has gained the trust of almost the whole community, hence the percentage is higher as just 50%. I know that enwiki has a blurry procedure where the bureaucrats decide what the final percentage is after the vote. That way they can decide when it is between 75 and 80%. I do not consider a further rise of the percentage necessarily, I think that 75% is the regular percentage on Wiki's, and when no percentage is defined, I always use that percentage with community elections of sysops.

I heard complaints on my talkpage on the program of the candidate. That is actually not my case. The community has to judge whether he is a suitable candidate, not me. I hope to have answered the most urgent questions. I would like to ask everybody urgently NOT to edit each others comments. Not even grammar errors. Doing that might lead to falcification of data. Of course you can edit your own comments, but when it is the comment of someone else, please only put an erratum below it. Thanks. Effeietsanders 07:12, 15 יוני 2007 (UTC)

Thanks Effeietsanders, for clarifying these points. And you are absolutely right. Can you clarify one more thing, if the 100 edits also needs to be before the votes has started? --טעכניקער 12:35, 15 יוני 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I added the counting date this afternoon already as I found out that it was missing. Thanks for noticing. Effeietsanders 16:57, 15 יוני 2007 (UTC)

I want to let you know that this list was proved by our all community that they are definitely a part of יודל's names. ►רוני◄ 03:05, 20 יוני 2007 (UTC)

סתם פאר אינטערסאנטקייט

קוקט דא.--69.114.50.208 15:41, 18 יוני 2007 (UTC)

A week after, now what?

It's already a week after the votes has officially been closed, Is there any update of the final resolution of the vote.

Even in the United States where over 120 million people vote on a single day, it takes just one day (except in Florida in 2002) to declare the winner. --אלץ-ווייסער 16:07, 9 יולי 2007 (UTC)

most voters were agisnt this contreversial candidaste and you were for him and a steward has found you a sockpuypet on this page once before so we did not block you but your vote is not a think we should consider sockpupets get blocked usuely all togather--כייעם 16:09, 9 יולי 2007 (UTC)

Explanation of my vote

Against - דערקעגן

I know i cannot change any minds and hearts this late in the game, I and only I am to blame that he has come so far to be considered again as sysop after the foundation had to take it away from him, Only i have watered and planted this ground swell of support for him, because i fought in unsmart ways to make allot of people his friends and my enemies. I take fully responsibility if he gets elected i will not even try to fight and i will view him as a blind delegate and powerful mandate to rule with an iron fist since there is no real active daily users to talk to, like most of his fans are non-Yiddish speakers like DMV and sleeping user names like Shmalts and others who woke only now before the votes.
I am not broken or weakened by his promotion that he declares will be my demise. I have never thought this is going to be easy. When i have first come to revive the yiddish wikipedia i knew the enemy which are the power machines in our society why they are the only active Internet Yiddish fonts users for their work in the party newspapers will not sit silent. I knew they have the money man force and ability's to trick the system into creating a false community sense to lock us of free content of information. knowing all this i came in here and declared them for what they are: a bunch of imbeciles and partisan hacks and ignoramus who have one goal that their rabbi should lead. I am now more then ever convinced that i will win them in the end of the day
First of all lets be honest and open: Ronny is the most active user in our project since its conception and nobody, not even me, comes close to his contribution list to our wikipedia, and we all thank him and respect him for his life and creativity which he has given so tiresly day and night Shabbat and weekdays, constantly and religiously, for free and under tremendous hardship. It is only fare and just that we vote to promote him in the place of sysop, and in the past i have even asked the stewards to make him bureaucrat.
But this time around we must pass on this promotion, and must not act upon our gratitude to him, lets use reason and logic not heart and emotion.
Experience with him has shown that we must act responsible for our further growth to limit his power not to be more then all of us in the community. He was already sysop Bureaucrat and abused it in ways that the Wikimedia Foundation was forced to mix in and take it away, he has promoted himself as sysop 2 or more times on other names with no votes and has blocked articles and users who he was in edit wars. Although we must find ways and means to repay him and glorify his positive contributions so other will follow his ways and justice will be served. Sysop at this moment isn't the smart gift to reward him, and the reasons are as follows:

1. He has been known as a troubled human being, unfortunately, by his account, (which i beg everyone not to believe since i found allot of inconsistency's in his emails and chat with me that makes this sound as a huge lie to manipulate the community by a fabricated image.) on his user page that he calls himself as a drop out of the hasidic culture who left his society and social circle of friends and surrounding to become a secular Jew, while young and fragile. Being tormented in life like this is usually a think that nobody should mention and talk about but since he taunts this all the time we may take this in account while considering his ability to lead us. Yes this is overall in many eyes a positive experience of growth but it also has its side affects, that it isn't proper for others to judge but in the words of one of our 3 respected sysops, user:heral: He as a constant criticiser and accuser and big shot who belittles other users. Unfortunately i agree about this troubled attitude which is a negative force when it has more power then others.
2. He is constantly busy reverting the Hasidic Yiddish style to the yidishists with an uncivil disregard to the community who are mainly hasidic Yiddish speakers, i see in this a dangerous dictatorship, as a user who hasn't gotten the idea what means a free and open project that the community has the last word not one brash user over all, this is going to be in grave concern once he becomes the only active sysop nobody can unlock his versions of articles.
3. And finely lets say to the obvious question if the community of 75 percent of users do put their trust in him, maybe this shoes that he has changed his stubborn ways of dealing with others and is willing to listen to the community? i would urge everybody to use caution and to realise this cannot be the case, since he has never apologized for his sysop abuse for which the Wikimedia Foundation has taken away his power, so why should we give him another chance when he says he has done nothing wrong for abusing this tools already?
4. He is not the guy who he is telling us he is i have shown pictures of him with chariedy guys by the Israeli wikipedia convention and this shoes that his user name is used by the party hacks of our power srtrulgs and he is not any outsider to yiddish that's why he also wants to write only the Yiddishists yiddish style to halt our growth form the yiddish users. please don't vote for him or please don't be fooled that by voting for him you are damaging our growth we will go forward no matter what. Thank you very much for reading this

--יודל 14:15, 17 יוני 2007 (UTC)

---

AGREE - מסכים

This Yiddish Wikipedia went thru a lot of growng pains, and after more than 2 years, all of the editors and writers, know one thing: We have no future here if ROONY does not become Sysop. why:

1. We are being threatend by a vandal, who uses more tham 140 usernames, for the purpose of inflamentory, deragetory, abuse and sexual explicit material. Yes this is a free Wikipedia, and we all need Freedom - but please, NOT to be bombarded with childish seuxal content and a barrage of Hasidic Politics, with deragetory articles agaist hundreds of people, who are not in the Hasidic party as באנוצער:יודל.
2. With all due respect for his contributions. There is no person in favor of his dictatorship and sexual content. Not because we're for censorship, but for the sake of unity and harmony, we're sick and tired of the edit wars with the vandal and his 140 usernames. If this is ment to stay like that: pleae shut the Yi Wiki for good.
3. The Yiddish language and culture has a lot more to offer than the dirty politics about Aron or Zalmen Teitelbaum. We must not be dragged in this ugly political jiihad. This can only happen if באנוצער:רוני, becomes elected as sysop.--אלץ-ווייסער 02:29, 18 יוני 2007 (

UTC)

Summery: Steward silencing consensus and encouraging sockpuptery and vandalism

Its fare to say that our community is under attack from a steward who has abused his power to shut the voice of a consensus and community that he dose not even speak the languge. He striked all the votes that did not match his self made up rulls and reverted [3] the striked votes of sockpupets and vandals. we will overcome this steward and we will not seize to grow. i beg all other stewards who have some decency to revert everything that efietsanders has done here. He has blocked oposition from the steward Chanel after we exposed his unjust actions and we were constantly belittled and berated by him on that Chanel. Sysop means representative of the community and here the community has voiced its protest not to promote this dangerous candidate for sysop please don't overstep our community thanks

--יאסי 21:39, 1 יולי 2007 (UTC)

Please ignore באַניצער:יאסי its the same באנוצער:יודל. Eiff. We support you fully.--67.107.109.102 13:39, 2 יולי 2007 (UTC)

↺ rev-ID : -

requests for additional user rights

• (please insert your request below)

BotMultichill

Hi, i request a bot bit for BotMultichill.

• Botmaster : Multichill
• Bot's name : BotMultichill
• List of botflags on others wikipedias: 30 atm (see meta:User:Multichill for the current list)
• Purpose: Interwiki (pywikipedia)
• Technical details : BotMultichill is an interwiki bot starting at the Dutch wikipedia. The bot uses the pywikipedia framework and runs day and night in autonomous mode. Sometimes the bot will run in manual assisted mode to solve interwiki conflicts. Multichill 14:04, 5 יוני 2007 (UTC)

let us try u out first please dont expect bot status before we know u

your work here is going to be cherished and much wanted but we need transperecy

if u r working behind the scenbec of the normel user youyr bot must have some status

thanks for caring about us--Yiddish wikipedia 14:35, 5 יוני 2007 (UTC)

---

Byrialbot

Hello, I ask for permission to use my interwiki bot Byrialbot here, and possibly get a botflag for it if your prefer.

• Owner: User:byrial (Home project: da:User:Byrial)
• Purpose: Interwiki
• Runs with botflag at: ar:, da:, en:, eo:, fo:, he:, is:, it:, nds:, nn:, no:, sv:, uk: and it is requested other places.
• Details: The bot wil do interwiki linking starting from da:, nn:, no:, and sv: using the Pywikipediabot framework. It will mostly run manually assisted and I will try to solve found interwiki conflicts.

The bot is not running yet as it waits for your permission. Please tell if you like to see some test edits. Thank you! Byrial 22:26, 10 יוני 2007 (UTC)