Effeietsanders

 

I respect your job as a elected Steward over all wikipedias and therefore i beg you please open your eyes and see how you are acting against the interest of the collective goal of the Wikipedia model.

 

We have one interest: To build and protect "a free and open encyclopedia". Only second to that comes in the community factor and role, although it is intertwined, there is no open encyclopedia without a free community. But first we have to protect the freenes and openness to grow a community.

 

This all is a simple straight forward premise and foundation that no user needs to learn too much to understand, but yet since you don't speak this projects language you have become a huge setback to this concept.

 

#You have set votes that was against the will of the community just a month before without making any vote if we should first undo that privies decision.

#Yudel has notified you that this guy you push on us has declared openly that he will rule here with censorship, you have dismissed this grave concern as a community problem.

#We asked you in light of those contreversial thinks please make here like the english wiki with 80 mpercent you have declined.

#You have written that you saw some ludicrous vote on meta as a straw poll on this Vandals popularity, as if a steward does not know that "sysop" is not a popularety contest it is a real responsible job, yet you declare that you see a community's will to govern here with censorship as not your problem.

#I am here today to tell you some news my friend: Yes It is going to be your problem, because you forced on us this vote, the timing and the rules. Its your community and its your act that will make this decision.

#You are responsible on this joke that a declared sockpupet by another [http://yi.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D7%B0%D7%99%D7%A7%D7%99%D7%A4%D6%BC%D7%A2%D7%93%D7%99%D7%A2:%D7%90%D7%93%D7%9E%D7%99%D7%A0%D7%99%D7%A1%D7%98%D7%A8%D7%90%D7%98%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%9F1&diff=prev&oldid=91165] Steward after 2 check users can still vote in your community [http://yi.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D7%B0%D7%99%D7%A7%D7%99%D7%A4%D6%BC%D7%A2%D7%93%D7%99%D7%A2:%D7%90%D7%93%D7%9E%D7%99%D7%A0%D7%99%D7%A1%D7%98%D7%A8%D7%90%D7%98%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%9F&diff=108350&oldid=108314]. you can block him if you would really want the good of a community but you chose not to block him because you want your so called community to exist.

#You are responsible that a user who hasn't had a single edit to the main name space can be considered a community, [http://yi.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?limit=50&title=%D7%91%D7%90%D6%B7%D7%96%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%93%D7%A2%D7%A8%3AContributions&contribs=user&target=%D7%99%D7%A2%D7%A7%D7%9C%D7%A8%D7%90%D7%A6%D7%99%D7%92%D7%A2%D7%A8&namespace=0 only erasing others work]. When we ask you why you consider this guy a legitemete vote? You choose to ignore us because it can jeopardise your so called community.

#You are one sided biased user who calls yudel a sockpupet in meta and asks the other stewards to block him while you never ever call for the blocking of your chosen community's socpupets because it will jeopardise your so called community.

#I wish you good luck and you can go ahead and erase my vote because i came in only a day after your community's sockpupets names and i have twice as much as their edits here.

 

Enjoy your community!